Issue: multi tenant setup from auth0-sample

Archived content
,
1

Hello,

Not sure if it is the right place to post that, .

  • What are you trying to achieve? What is the use case or idea behind it?
    I’m trying to evaluate multitenant app with auth0, but I’m stuck in the setup, I opened an issue: https://github.com/auth0-samples/auth0-multitenant-website/issues/14

  • If this is caused by an SDK please mention the SDK along with the specific version number.
    Don’t think this is sdk, but I following these steps : https://github.com/auth0-samples/auth0-multitenant-website

  • Is this easily reproducible? If not, please explain.
    Yes.

  • If this is related to Lock / any SDK please share the SDK as well as lock initialization code or any code that is relevant.
    No

Thanks

2

Hey there,

I am one of the original authors of this sample. This was built a while back for the purposes of a webinar and it has not been updated since and likely will need to handle some new changes in auth0 like claim namespacing. I’ll take a look at what might be the cause and push a fix as soon as possible. I’ll update here once I am done.

After I fix this issue I am going to be archiving this repository so that it doesn’t cause concern in the future. I’ll also follow up on your issue in GitHub once I take a look. Sorry for the confusion here.

Shawn

1 Like
3

Hey there,

I went ahead and updated this sample. In the end the sample was created before Auth0 forced namespaces for clients (pre-OIDC conformance). Since then, custom claims are now requiring namespaces in the JWT. I updated this application to use an expected namespace and everything should be working.

Here is a commit for that change if you are interested:

https://github.com/auth0-samples/auth0-multitenant-website/commit/6b02c5f616863b8c96c68fcaad2380b23aef1e93

Regards,

Shawn

4

Hey, thanks for the update, I noticed two missing update so I commented the issue : Enhance auth0 setup part 4 : rule · Issue #14 · auth0-samples/auth0-multitenant-website · GitHub

I pull and locally fix it, it works ! thanks :slight_smile:

5

This topic was automatically closed 4 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.