Allow Wildcard port in Redirect URI as per RFC 8252

Feature:
http://localhost:* should be a valid redirect URI which can be used for native applications such that my application can pick any free port when authentication is being performed on a user’s machine.

Description:
According to RFC 8252 “OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps” RFC 8252: OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps
“The authorization server MUST allow any port to be specified at the
time of the request for loopback IP redirect URIs, to accommodate
clients that obtain an available ephemeral port from the operating
system at the time of the request.”

However Auth0 currently rejects Redirect URIs which contain a wildcard port (e.g. http://localhost:*). Native applications have no guarantee about the port they’re run on due to other processes on the user’s machine. Many other services and libraries are written to meet the spec in this RFC (as it’s best practice) but due to Auth0 not supporting it they are incompatible with Auth0.

This documentation from oauth.com (sponsored by Okta!) agrees with this RFC: Redirect URLs for Native Apps - OAuth 2.0 Simplified
“”“In order to suppor this use case, the authorization server will have to support registering redirect URLs beginning with http://127.0.0.1:[port]/ > and http://::1:[port]/, and http://localhost:[port]/. The authorization server should allow an arbitrary path component as well as arbitrary port numbers. Note that in this case it is acceptable to use the HTTP scheme rather than HTTPS, as the request never leaves the device.”“”

Use-case:
I’m building native applications using frameworks such as Tauri, Electron, or even just CLIs on devices where input is not constrained. The user has a copy of the product on their machine, and authentication needs to be redirected to a localhost port. I have no control over the free ports on these machines, and in some cases can’t guarantee that the OS has released a port from a previous version of our application, such as during an upgrade process.

I’m also certainly not the first to ask about this, although it looks like I may be the first to request it here. With prrevious questions on the topic just being closed with “We don’t support this” without any accompanying explanation as to why, or that it will be implemented in future.

See:

Hey there!

Thanks for creating this feedback card! Make sure to upvote it so that it attract as much attention from other community members as well!

1 Like